Skip to content
IO Lab

Barriers to innovation
in healthcare.

Understanding what stops an idea from reaching patients, and building the education and support to move it forward.

Dr. Marc Succi began the first national survey of barriers to innovation at an academic health system in 2019. Published in Nature Biotechnology in 2022, the work forms part of a continuing research program connecting medical innovation and training. [1–9]

This body of work has been cited hundreds of times and accessed over 10,000 times. Explore the publications.

Explore the survey findings

What holds trainees back?

The barriers-to-innovation studies examined medical students, residents, and faculty. Only 31% considered themselves innovators. Participants identified obstacles to developing ideas and the support they wanted to pursue them. [3]

Reported barriers

Share rating each barrier “most important”

Limited time and energy43%
Lack of physical resources35%
Lack of expertise31%
Selected results from the study led by Dr. Succi and his team, published in Nature Biotechnology (2022). n = 51. [3]

Support trainees wanted

Share selecting each form of support

Dedicated time61%
Grants and startup funding49%
Partnership with mentors47%
Questions about support used a different response format from the barrier rankings. [3]

Understanding an idea does not mean having the confidence to act on it.

The survey also examined understanding and confidence across 17 innovation skills. The patterns varied by skill, giving educators a more specific picture of where practical instruction could help. Explore the distributions below. [3]

ExcellentGoodFairPoorVery poor
Understanding
Confidence
0%25%50%75%100%
Adapted from Figure 2 of the 2022 study led by Dr. Succi and his team. Approximate percentages. [3]
View the full chart for all 17 skills
Understanding and confidence across all 17 innovation skills. Approximate percentages. Adapted from Figure 2. [3]
ExcellentGoodFairPoorVery poor
Innovation skillUnderstandingConfidence

Patent process

Understanding
Confidence

Drug development

Understanding
Confidence

Creating a prototype

Understanding
Confidence

Taking a therapeutic through clinical trials

Understanding
Confidence

Writing a business plan

Understanding
Confidence

Market analysis

Understanding
Confidence

Value proposition

Understanding
Confidence

Non-confidential marketing summary

Understanding
Confidence

Coding

Understanding
Confidence

3-D printing

Understanding
Confidence

Starting a company or participating in a startup

Understanding
Confidence

Working with industry: sponsored research

Understanding
Confidence

Working with industry: licensing IP

Understanding
Confidence

Working with industry: consulting

Understanding
Confidence

Submitting an invention disclosure

Understanding
Confidence

Working with healthcare policy legislatures

Understanding
Confidence

Investing: angel investing, Series A and Series B

Understanding
Confidence

2026 update to barriers

A 2026 study led by Dr. Succi and his team in the IO lab extended this research to faculty, clinicians, investors, industry professionals and technology-transfer staff. Among 277 respondents, funding, community support and time were the most frequently reported barriers. [9]

The study broadens the question: what support do people need at different points in the path from clinical idea to commercialization?

Barriers reported in the 2026 paper

Share agreeing that each is a restrictive barrier

Lack of monetary resources70%
Lack of community support55%
Lack of time49%
Study led by Dr. Succi and his team, published in Nature Biotechnology (2026). n = 277. These results are from a separate survey and should not be interpreted as a trend from 2022. [9]

A documented
research history.

2018

A published foundation for MESH

The original technology-incubator and design-thinking curriculum described a hospital-based route into medical invention. [1]

2019

The barriers survey begins

Dr. Succi began the survey project that would examine barriers to innovation among medical trainees.

2020

Hands-on training enters residency

The initial MESH Core evaluation documented an innovation curriculum within a radiology residency program and department. [2]

2022

The trainee survey is published

A study led by Dr. Succi and his team reported gaps in innovation experience, resources and confidence in Nature Biotechnology. [3]

2023

Training expands; incentives enter the discussion

An international-conference bootcamp evaluated short-term learning. A separate Nature Biotechnology paper proposed the innovation RVU as a way to recognize innovation work. [4][5]

2024

Five years of curriculum outcomes

The MESH Core report evaluated training delivered from 2018 through 2022. Related papers addressed career development and departmental leadership. [6][7][8]

2026

The survey broadens to the innovation ecosystem

A study led by Dr. Succi and his team examined funding, community support and time across clinicians, investors, industry and technology-transfer professionals. [9]

Turning the findings
into teaching.

Dr. Succi’s international innovation courses extend that teaching beyond a single hospital. [1] [4]

Explore Teaching

Measured educational outcomes

In the 2024 MESH Core report, Dr. Succi and his team evaluated five years of delivery to 40 residents. Median knowledge scores rose from 48% before the course to 86% afterward. [6]

The team’s 2023 evaluation of a bootcamp at an international medical conference also reported higher immediate knowledge scores after teaching. [4]

About this research

What are the main barriers to innovation in healthcare?

The surveys identify time, resources, expertise and support as recurring concerns. Which barriers matter most depends on the people surveyed and the stage of development. The 2022 trainee study and 2026 stakeholder study examine different groups. [3] [9]

How does this relate to Mass General Brigham and MESH?

Dr. Succi developed this research through the MESH Incubator and collaborations at Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School. The work connects research on barriers to innovation with Dr. Succi’s courses inside and outside the hospital system, including international programs. The linked papers identify their authors, affiliations and methods.

Papers & sources

Read the original publications for methods, results and limitations.

  1. Succi MD, Uppot RN, Gee MS, McLoud TC, Brink JA. Medically Engineered Solutions in Health Care: A Technology Incubator and Design-Thinking Curriculum for Radiology Trainees. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018;15(6):892-896.
  2. Succi MD, Zamarron BF, Fintelmann FJ, Andriole KP, Ottensmeyer MP, Whitehead DC, Harris GJ, McLoud TC, Brink JA, Gee MS, Uppot RN. Initial Experience Integrating a Hands-On Innovation Curriculum Into a Radiology Residency Program and Department. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020;17(10):1329-1333.
  3. Boms O, Shi Z, Mallipeddi N, Chung JJ, Marks WH, Whitehead DC, Succi MD. Integrating innovation as a core objective in medical training. Nature Biotechnology. 2022;40(3):434-437.
  4. Succi MD, Cheng D, Andriole KP, Fintelmann FJ, Flores EJ, Zhang HM, Gee MS, Coburn CM, Brink JA. Integrating a healthcare innovation bootcamp into an international medical conference to democratize innovation learning. Nature Biotechnology. 2023;41(4):579-581.
  5. Mallipeddi NV, Chandra J, Succi MD. A strategy to incentivize innovation in the health care system: the innovation RVU. Nature Biotechnology. 2023;41(10):1485-1487.
  6. Liu DS, Mazurek MH, Whitehead DC, Hood MC, Choi P, Gupte A, Ottensmeyer MP, Fintelmann FJ, Uppot RN, Andriole KP, Gee MS, Brink JA, Succi MD. A Novel Design-Thinking, Hospital Innovation Core Certificate Curriculum for Radiologists and Trainees: Creation, Implementation, and Multiyear Results. Academic radiology. 2024;31(2):417-425.
  7. Russo MV, Di Capua J, Som A, Smith AD, Laroia ST, Succi MD. Building a Career in Radiology Innovation: A Primer for Trainees and First-Time Innovators to Act on Opportunities. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2024;21(10):1604-1607.
  8. Succi MD, Rao A, Gee MS, Coburn C, Brink JA. Empowering Radiology’s Future: A Proposed Leadership and Innovation Framework for a Radiology Department. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2024;21(10):1616-1619.
  9. Rao AS, Zhao L, Pulukuri S, Antony I, Rice L, Glover WJ, Murphy WM, Gupte A, Schwartzstein D, Succi MD. Survey-based insights on overcoming barriers in healthcare innovation ecosystems. Nature Biotechnology. 2026;44(7):1239-1243.

Get IO Lab announcements

New research, courses, events, and opportunities, by email.

Subscribe